CO129-557-12 Armstrong and Turner v. Estate Duty Commissioner- appeal to Privy Council 18-5-1936 - 2-10-1936 — Page 4

two paragraphs of paragraph 5, ask them if they

are prepared to advise us on the point there raised,

if not whether they will ascertain the practice

from the Inland Revenue authorities or if they would

prefer that we should do so, and add that it seems

to us that until that point is settled it would

appear to be undesirable to incur more costs

in relation to the appeal than is necessary.

2

Burchells

25.6.36.

Serhat

20wh

25/6/36

Interates that they have hear about is

& would like to su

4

る

3 To Bouschells (

w 2 copeschel 1 + 10 of end 2 + 3 mm No 1

W

w Dupe Arspalch. Jons

H

Burchells

4/7/36

Acks (3) locke avoue later on

pouté racer

778

(

Chunki

8/3/26

21/8 5 To J.R. mek. willis (16 18 orig. moll.) 4/0 (21/7/26

210 bons./